![]() ![]() We could inflict terrible casualties, and so could Saddam.Ĥ. We shouldn't start wars without immediate provocation and international support.ģ. Containment has worked for 10 years, and inspections could still work.Ģ. Al Qaeda will be at war with us regardless of what we do in Iraq.ġ. A democratic Iraq could begin to liberalize the Arab world.Ĩ. ![]() A democratic Iraq could unlock the Israeli-Palestinian stalemate.ħ. A democratic Iraq could drain influence from repressive Saudi Arabia.Ħ. Iraqis are suffering under tyranny and sanctions.ĥ. Saddam has used weapons of mass destruction and has never stopped trying to develop them.ģ. Given that you often hear war supporters say that the doves opposed this war for the wrong reasons, it's interesting to see what Packer considered the arguments of the two sides:Ģ. Before America invaded Iraq, George Packer wrote an article for The New York Times Magazine on the liberal hawks that sought to categorize the pro- and anti-war arguments.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |